Thursday, 06 Dec 2007
  • contact us
  • about us
  • rss
  • support rooz
  • archive
  • opinion
  • interview
  • cartoon
  • news
interview
December 6, 2007

Judges Who Set Inappropriate Bails are Guilty

Shirin Ebadi
Shirin Ebadi

 

 

Omid Memarian

o.memarian@roozonline.com

In an exclusive interview with Rooz, while criticizing inappropriate charges brought ‎against activists by the judiciary, Shirin Ebadi stated, “unfortunately, when social and ‎political activists are frowned upon by the government for their civil and constructive ‎criticism, they are charged with various political accusations.”

‎

shirinebadi620.jpg

Commenting on the cases of Rounak Safazadeh and Hana Abdi, two members of the One ‎Million Signatures campaign who have been accused of collaborating with Pezhak [an ‎armed Kurdish separatist group], Ebadi said, “Their real charge and their true crime is ‎that they demand equal rights and believe that God has created equal beings with equal ‎rights. Because certain officials find it difficult to tolerate this viewpoint, they have ‎framed new charges for these young women, accusing them of disrupting public order ‎and conspiring to overthrow the regime. I have asked judiciary’s officials several times, ‎if a woman does not want her husband to have the right to marry a second woman, does ‎that mean that she is conspiring with the United States? If a young girl says, I want the ‎same rights as my brother, is she committing treason against her nation?” ‎

Ebadi also said that she fears women’s rights activists Jelveh Javaheri and Maryam ‎Hosseinkhah will remain in prison because of their extraordinary high bail amounts: ‎‎“from a legal standpoint, the bail amount must be set in accordance with the type of ‎crime, motivation behind committing the crime, the personality of the criminal and the ‎context surrounding the case. The judge sets a bail amount with respect to all of these ‎factors. It is very painful to see a bail amount of 1,000 million rials for a young female ‎journalist whose only crime is that she wrote several articles criticizing discriminatory ‎laws. Her family has so far been unable to prepare this amount.” ‎

She added that her client is not willing to meet such a high bail amount: “Maryam has ‎sent a message asking her friends not to prepare her bail, because it is very unjust and she ‎protests it. She is willing to stay in prison in protest. Furthermore, the action of the ‎judge is against the law. Essentially, Javaheri and Hosseinkhah are willing to stay in ‎prison to protest an illegal action by the judge.” ‎

Commenting on the activities of Maryam Hosseinkhah and Jelveh Javaheri, Ebadi said, ‎‎“both these women are writers and their crime is that they have protested discriminatory ‎laws by gathering signatures. The special judge in the Revolutionary Court has set a ‎‎1,000 million rial bail for Hosseinkhah and a 500 million rial bail for Javaheri, even ‎though these two girls live modestly and do not have even 10 million rials in savings. ‎They are prisoners in the general women’s ward because they are unable to prepare their ‎bail. Fortunately, they observe their duties even in prison. They assisted some of the ‎women who were still in detention because of confusion among judiciary’s officials by ‎finding volunteer lawyers for them, and one of these women has already been released. ‎The world has to salute the will of Iranian women who strive to improve the lives of their ‎fellow women in Iran even when serving time in prison for saying the truth.” ‎

The winner of the 2003 Nobel Peace Prize added at the end that those who set ‎inappropriate bail amounts are themselves guilty of violating the law: “the bail amount ‎must be appropriate. This has not been observed with respect of any of the ‎aforementioned individuals, which is itself a violation and I hope that the judiciary’s ‎oversight committee one day would investigate all violations that take place in cases ‎involving political prisoners. All such actions are against the law. Anyone who commits ‎such actions has acted against the law and must be rebuked by the oversight committee.” ‎



No tags available.

back to rooz start page
latest interviews
30-Apr-2012
Fereshteh Ghazi
Fereshteh Ghazi
A Journalist’s Account
What Happened at the Election Commission in 2009?
19-Apr-2012
Kaveh Ghoreishi
Kaveh Ghoreishi
Rooz Talks with Sociologist Khaled Tavakoli
Growing Social Unrest and Violence in Kurdistan
17-Apr-2012
Fereshteh Ghazi
Fereshteh Ghazi
Rooz Exclusive Interview with Mohammad-Reza Motamednia
Hunger Strike Till Mousavi and Karoubi are Released
07-Mar-2012
Sara Samavati
Rooz Talks With Hamid-Reza Jalaeipour
Ninth Majlis to be Tamer
02-Nov-2011
Fereshteh Ghazi
Fereshteh Ghazi
Rooz Interview with Mehdi Khazali
Both Factions of Iranian Regime are Collapsing
24-Aug-2011
Kaveh Ghoreishi
Kaveh Ghoreishi
A Kurdish Observer on Kurdish Events
The Approaching Human Disaster
16-May-2011
Kaveh Ghoreishi
Kaveh Ghoreishi
Latest Status of Kurdish Prisoner in Interview with His Family and Activists
Latifi Awaiting Execution
 
  • Delicious
  • Donbaleh
  • Balatarin
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Bookmark this page:
Search
print this page
Newsletter subscription
Tip a friend
Authors of Roozonline
2006 - 2013 © Rooz online