<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	
	<title>roozonline.com: Latest News</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.roozonline.com/" />
	<updated>2012-02-10T21:20:00+01:00</updated>
	<generator uri="http://www.typo3.com" version="4.5">TYPO3 - get.content.right</generator>
	<id>http://www.roozonline.com/</id>
	<subtitle>Latest News</subtitle>
		
	
		
	<entry>
		<title>Reactivation of Iran’s Dissident Assassinations Program</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.roozonline.com/english/news3/newsitem/archive/2012/february/10/article/reactivation-of-irans-dissident-assassinations-program.html"/>
		<updated>2012-02-10T21:30:15+01:00</updated>
		<published>2012-02-10T21:22:02+01:00</published>
		<id>tag:roozonline.com,2012:article36060</id>
		<author>
			<name>Leila Tayyeri</name>
		</author>
		<summary type="html" xml:base="http://www.roozonline.com/">
			<![CDATA[News reports indicating that the assassination of Iranian political activists outside the country is once again on the agenda of the Islamic republic of Iran. Among personalities on the target list are Dr Abdol-Karim Soroosh and Nobel Peace Laureate Shirin Ebadi, while others too have received death threats through the phone or emails.
Based on reports received by Rooz, the assassination of a number of prominent Iranian opposition figures is on the agenda of the intelligence and security apparatus of the Islamic republic of Iran. In a related development, two foreign nationals in a foreign country have recently been reported to have been detained and interrogated by local police officials over their activities in gathering intelligence regarding an Iranian opposition personality in that country.
Rooz has received information that Shirin Ebadi, Abdol-Karim Soroosh and a defected former senior Iranian official are among those who have received death threats by individuals associated with the regime in Tehran.
In addition, a number of Iranian political activists and journalists residing outside the country have also received threatening emails. Some of these emails have originated from Iranian embassies in countries where the activists live. The emails threaten the activists to remain silent or face the consequences of their actions and statements.
Commentators have said that as relations between Tehran and the West have deteriorated, and the possibility of a military strike against Iran’s military installations is gaining media circulation, such threats against dissidents living abroad have multiplied and intensified. According to some analysts the morale of Iranian personnel at the country’s nuclear facilities have dropped because of the recent assassination of Iranian scientists and nuclear professionals, and as a consequence the regime may be embarking on a revengeful path as a way to improve the morale of the members of the nuclear community.
Following the stern response of European countries against the assassinations of Iranian political activists and Kurdish leaders by the Islamic republic of Iran at the Mikonos restaurant in Berlin and reformist president Khatami’s ascent to power, Iran suspended its assassination activities outside the country. These assassination missions by the country intelligence ministry were acknowledged during the trials of some intelligence officers (the trials are commonly known as the chain murders) that were held in Iran after a number of prominent Iranian dissidents and former political leaders were brutally assassinated around the country in the late 1980s.
An Iranian journalist living in France told Rooz that he has received death threats on the phone and through emails. “They sent a message saying that living abroad was not an issue for them and that they could easily bring us back into the country whenever they decided it was necessary,” he said. Even though he said that he had filed formal complaints to the police authorities in his country of residence he would not rule out the possibility of the regime carrying out its threats. These threats, he added, indicated that the Islamic republic has been seriously weakened and shaken and had chosen to threaten its opponents, indicating the failings of the regime.
Among Iranians who have filed reports with local police authorities because of the threats they have received are two defectors who had previously held senior positions in the Iranian regime.]]>
		</summary>
	</entry>
		
	<entry>
		<title>Assad's Red Carpet for Russians</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.roozonline.com/english/news3/newsitem/archive/2012/february/09/article/assads-red-carpet-for-russians.html"/>
		<updated>2012-02-09T01:20:37+01:00</updated>
		<published>2012-02-09T01:20:33+01:00</published>
		<id>tag:roozonline.com,2012:article36059</id>
		<author>
			<name>Nikahang Kosar</name>
		</author>
		<summary type="html" xml:base="http://www.roozonline.com/">
			<![CDATA[]]>
		</summary>
	</entry>
		
	<entry>
		<title>Their Elections and Our Elections</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.roozonline.com/english/news3/newsitem/archive/2012/february/08/article/their-elections-and-our-elections.html"/>
		<updated>2012-02-08T20:36:57+01:00</updated>
		<published>2012-02-08T20:36:52+01:00</published>
		<id>tag:roozonline.com,2012:article36036</id>
		<author>
			<name>Morteza Kazemian</name>
		</author>
		<summary type="html" xml:base="http://www.roozonline.com/">
			<![CDATA[The elections of the regime have started and are in progress. In fact it has been months since the show campaigns and activities for the fake elections have begin. The rulers of Iran began their games with a democratic institution – elections – even before the leader of the Islamic regime said that the forthcoming elections should not turn into a security issue. These included registering the candidates and then engaging in a fake game of approving or disapproving them; threats against political opponents and critics of the existing conditions in the country; illegalizing political reformist groups; summoning and threatening Green Movement activists and reformists, etc. Power mongers inside the regime have used every unlawful tool to mask the regime. Mir-Hossein Mousavi explained this well in 2010 when he said that it took him two months to realize that the infamous televised election debates that were held in 2009 were not for the purpose of driving him or Mr. Karoubi out of the elections process but to completely and permanently remove all opponents of the regime and to monopolize the political system. “I was only one of their targets and obstacles. The ruling gang had been planning to monopolize power for twenty years and it appeared that these elections were the final act. Power mongers acted to remove all critics and opponents from the national picture, something similar to North Korea but with a democratic mask,” he said. 
In one of their most recent acts, Iran’s ruling circles shut down Roozgar newspaper because of its publication of an important interview with Mohammad-Reza Khatami. It is surprising that such important comments by a leading member of the reformist Participation Front were published in a domestic newspaper at this time. The closure of the newspaper was a foregone conclusion after the publication. Who has any doubts that such words and cries of protest are displeasing to the power mongers? Particularly as this happened just a few weeks after the reiterated warnings by the supreme leader. His call for a “healthy” election without disruption of the peace and security of the regime means nothing other than calling for a grave silence so that the engineered elections can proceed.
These are the conditions that the regime has announced for its elections as the hardliners will pursue to elect one among themselves. So these elections will be held the way ayatollah Khamenei wants: long lines of voters and the presence of enemy-busting regime loyalists! Foreign reporters will be “allowed” to witness “their elections” and appear at pre-determined voting booths. They will be expected and told to film the enthusiastic crowds who will have been waiting for the booths to open in the cold of winter. These voters and supporters will be bussed and “mobilized” in front of these reporters from Varamin and Hashtgerd and other large cities. These are the very mercenaries who were the supporters of the regime and who have on many occasions come with their clubs and batons. The election theater of Mr. Khamenei must of course take place without any trouble-makers and those seeking to disrupt the “security” of the regime.
But the results of even this election cannot be foretold. The battles, threats, intimidations, blackmails, etc over the Majlis seats are already in progress. A gang by the name of “Ahmadinejad-Mashai” is currently the troublemaker of the core of the Islamic regime. Under these conditions, reformers and those who want change can only be silent observers as their leaders remain under house arrest while their loyal friends are behind bars. 
But these are not the type of elections we want and call for. We desire fair, open and competitive elections with international standards. Democracy has special conditions. But describing it within the rule of dictators turns into a joke. If the massive crowds that in 2010 marched the streets and chanted “Where is my Vote” do not come out and demand their own elections in the coming weeks, they shall be handing over everything to the power mongers. Despite all the efforts of regime to silence and isolate the voices of opposition and the critics, the elections are an opportunity for the reformers and dissidents to demand fair and open elections. Through creativity, every place and spot in this country can turn into a center for such demands. Those who demand this shall be doing it not just on behalf of others, but also for those who gave their life to this cause, such as Neda Agha Soltan, Haleh Sahabi, Sohrab Arabi and Hadi Saber. And also those who are in prisons and cannot make their voices heard.
Our elections cannot take place until the results of the 2009 elections have not been clarified by a fair and legitimate forum; the leaders of the Green movement and the loyal partisans of the movement remain in prison; national events continue to be dictated by the leader of the Islamic regime and the secretary of the Guardians Council, the Revolutionary Guards, Intelligence apparatus and Kayhan newspaper and so long as the media and political groups are barred from freely voicing their concerns.
Our elections have their own standards. The demand for these conditions is tied to the will and demands of every Iranian citizen. Until elections are held with international and accepted standards of fairness, freedom and openness, any such exercise shall remain “theirs” and not “ours.” The elections they are holding are shows and theater which are masked with democratic facades.]]>
		</summary>
	</entry>
		
	<entry>
		<title>Families of Bahai Leaders Speak Out</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.roozonline.com/english/news3/newsitem/archive/2012/february/06/article/families-of-bahai-leaders-speak-out.html"/>
		<updated>2012-02-06T11:17:25+01:00</updated>
		<published>2012-02-06T11:17:17+01:00</published>
		<id>tag:roozonline.com,2012:article35987</id>
		<author>
			<name>Fereshteh Ghazi</name>
		</author>
		<summary type="html" xml:base="http://www.roozonline.com/">
			<![CDATA[Speaking to Rooz, Hassan Fathy’s family revealed that a court had set bail for the journalist’s release, while the families of other Bahai leaders who have been behind bars for the past four years called for the observance of the political prisoners’ basic rights, including family visitation rights under Iranian law. 
Meanwhile, people close to Marziyeh Rasouli, a journalist who was arrested at her home during a midnight raid nearly two weeks ago, told Rooz that they have no information about Marziyeh’s condition or whereabouts, despite their daily visits to the Evin Prison’s administrative offices. Ms. Rasouli made a short call to her family minutes after her arrest but her condition since is unknown. 
Hassan Fathy was arrested on November 13 after speaking to the BBC Farsi television station about an explosion at a Revolutionary Guards facility. State-run media outlets have accused him of cooperation with the BBC Farsi television station, a claim that has been denied by both Fathy’s family and BBC. 
Hassan Fathy’s wife, Fatemeh Hejrat, tells Rooz, “They arrested my innocent husband. He had only spoken [to BBC] as a journalist, but he was accused of disrupting public order and disseminating lies, which is unfair.” 
In separate interviews with Rooz, the families of Fariba Kamalabadi and Jamaloddin Khanjani, who have been behind bars along with five other Bahai leaders for the past four years, called for the observance of their basic rights under Iranian law. 
Fariba Kamalabadi, Jamaloddin Khanjani, Afif Naeimi, Saeid Rezaie, Mahvash Sabet, Behrouz Tavakkoli, and Vahid Tizfahm are the seven Bahai leaders who ran a group known as the “Yaran” to lead Iran’s Bahai community. 
Mahvash Sabet has been behind bars since March 5, 2008, and the other six since May 14, 2008. They have been charged with national security crimes, including espionage for Israel, disrupting public morality, and acting against the Islamic Republic. 
The seven leaders were sentenced to 20 years behind bars by the trial court. The appellate court reduced the sentences to 10 years after throwing out charges such as espionage for Israel. The appellate court’s decision, however, was deemed to undermine the Sharia by Iran’s prosecutor general and was set aside to reinstate the trial court’s 20-year sentences. 
Since their arrests, the seven leaders have not been allowed to visit their families outside prison, a right guaranteed to all political prisoners under Iranian law. Ms. Kamalabadi’s brother tells Rooz, “Fariba, along with Ms. Mahvash Sabet, are at the Evin Prison. They have weekly visitations with their families along with 30 other political prisoners. They had no access to telephones until two months ago. Since then, they are allowed one very short call per month.”
He adds, “We are still waiting for their release, and we hope that they are freed immediately and unconditionally. In the very least, we ask that their rights under the law, such as visitation rights, be respected until their release.”]]>
		</summary>
	</entry>
		
	<entry>
		<title>“Silent Protest” Returns to Streets</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.roozonline.com/english/news3/newsitem/archive/2012/february/06/article/silent-protest-returns-to-streets.html"/>
		<updated>2012-02-06T11:09:04+01:00</updated>
		<published>2012-02-06T11:07:46+01:00</published>
		<id>tag:roozonline.com,2012:article35986</id>
		<author>
			<name>Arash Bahmani</name>
		</author>
		<summary type="html" xml:base="http://www.roozonline.com/">
			<![CDATA[As the anniversary of the 25 Bahman (February 14) protests approaches, several social media outlets have called on people to take to the streets. Meanwhile, the coordination council of the Rahe Sabz Omid (“Green Path of Hope”) has issued a statement calling on people to participate in a “silent protest” on the February 14 anniversary. 
The Rahe Sabz Omid’s statement, which was first published on the website Kalame¾affiliated with Mir-Hossein Mousavi¾noted that the protests should take place on the first anniversary of the February 14 protests and the start of the “green movement leaders’” house arrests. 
Last year, at the invitation of the two prominent green movement leaders, Mehdi Karoubi and Mir-Hossein Mousavi, their supporters came out to the streets to support the popular uprisings in Egypt and Tunisia. State security forces cracked down on the protests, and at least two protesters¾Sane’ Jaleh and Mohammad Mokhtari¾were killed in street clashes with state forces. 
After the protests, Mehdi Karoubi and Mir-Hossein Mousavi were both arrested and have been under house arrest since. The coordination council of Rahe Sabz Omid declared its existence shortly after, although the council’s performance since has been met with criticism from some green movement supporters. 
In its statement, the coordination council calls on security and police forces to “respect their fellow countrymen’s rights under the law and demonstrate to the world that they will not behave as suppression tools for a dictatorial regime.” The statement also refers to the “humanitarian, legal and religious” right of Iranians&nbsp; to protest their current living conditions and the state of affairs in their country. 
The Rahe Sabz Omid released its statement one week after 39 political prisoners wrote an open letter inviting the people to “deepen and expand their protest movement” and intensify efforts to release their “imprisoned leaders.” 
Meanwhile, activists used social networking websites to amplify the call for February 14 protests. The 25 Bahman Facebook page¾which is one of the most popular green movement pages on Facebook with more than 73,000 members¾ invited people to participate in the protest, even setting up a poll to determine the protest route. Members picked a route that ended at Pastor street, where Mir-Hossein Mousavi is under house arrest.]]>
		</summary>
	</entry>
		
	<entry>
		<title>Key in the Hands of Friday Prayer Leader </title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.roozonline.com/english/news3/newsitem/archive/2012/february/06/article/key-in-the-hands-of-friday-prayer-leader.html"/>
		<updated>2012-02-06T11:03:44+01:00</updated>
		<published>2012-02-06T10:41:58+01:00</published>
		<id>tag:roozonline.com,2012:article35985</id>
		<author>
			<name>Kaveh Ghoreishi</name>
		</author>
		<summary type="html" xml:base="http://www.roozonline.com/">
			<![CDATA[Marivan’s Friday prayer leader, Mamusta Mostafa Shirzadi, who is a main player in the twisted case of Loqman and Zanyar Moradi, is not willing to make any public comments about the case of the two young men who have been sentenced to death. Shirzadi tells Rooz, “I don’t think it wise to speak to the media; not now, not ever.” 
As Zanyar Moradi’s father tells Rooz, the death sentences have been upheld by the appellate court and have been forwarded to the relevant authorities for implementation. 
Zanyar Moradi and the 25-year-old Loqman Moradi have been charged for allegedly murdering Sa’adi, the Friday prayer leader’s son, as well as spying for the British government. 
In November 2009, Press TV, the Islamic Republic’s official English-language news network, announced that “four terrorists” with connections to the British government had been arrested in Marivan. According to that report, the four accused individuals had allegedly carried out five murders over a two-year period. 
Following that news report, a video was broadcast in English by Press TV, showing several individuals, including Zanyar and Loqman Moradi, confessing to the murder of the Friday prayer leader’s son. 
Loqman and Zanyar Moradi’s family members, however, previously told Rooz that the confessions were fabricated and extracted by force from their sons. 
Zanyar and Loqman Moradi have since released an open letter from prison announcing that their confessions were extracted under torture and after they were threatened with “sexual rape” by their interrogators. 
Under Iranian law, Zanyar and Loqman Moradi can escape death only if their family secures the agreement of the victim’s father, in this case the Marivan Friday prayer leader, Mamusta Mostafa Shirzadi. Zanyar’s father, Eqbal Moradi, tells Rooz, “Our only hope is that the Friday prayer leader doesn’t succumb to pressure from the national security organizations. Mamusta Shirzadi knows better than anyone else how his son was murdered. We think the Friday prayer leader has been caught in a political-national security game here. He knows that Zanyar and Loqman are innocent and I hope he remembers that.”
Loqman Moradi’s family members confirmed that they have not been able to visit their son, who is held at the Rajaishahr Prison in Karaj, for the past eight months. 
Several social media campaigns have been set up to stop the execution of these two young men, but it appears that the key to their lives in this instances is only in the hands of Mamusta Mustafa Shirzadi, who has lost his own son too.]]>
		</summary>
	</entry>
		
	<entry>
		<title>More Arrests Ahead of Elections</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.roozonline.com/english/news3/newsitem/archive/2012/february/04/article/more-arrests-ahead-of-elections.html"/>
		<updated>2012-02-04T19:52:37+01:00</updated>
		<published>2012-02-04T19:46:37+01:00</published>
		<id>tag:roozonline.com,2012:article35955</id>
		<author>
			<name>Fereshteh Ghazi</name>
		</author>
		<summary type="html" xml:base="http://www.roozonline.com/">
			<![CDATA[While the condition of recently detained journalists remains unknown, more journalists are arrested ahead of the upcoming parliamentary elections. In the latest instance, Reza Jelodarzadeh, editor-in-chief of the recently banned “Sobh-e Azadi” magazine was arrested. 
It is not evident which organ has arrested Mr. Jelodarzadeh, who is a wounded veteran of the Iran-Iraq war. Speaking to Rooz, the relatives of this detained journalists said they know nothing about his physical condition or whereabouts. 
Three other journalists were arrested immediately before Mr. Jelodarzadeh: Saham Bourghani, Marzieh Rasouli, and Parastou Dokouhaki. Nothing is known about the condition of the former two journalists, but Parastou Dokouhaki told her family members in a short telephone call that she was being held in solitary confinement. 
Parastou Dokouhaki is a journalist, blogger, and social activists who was arrested on January 16 at her house and has been in solitary confinement at the Evin Prison since. 
Saham Bourghani is also a journalist and the son of former government official Ahmad Bourghani. His condition is unknown, although some sources noted that he is being held at the Revolutionary Guards’ detention unit inside the Evin Prison. Marzieh Rasouli is also a journalist covering social issues. 
Amnesty International condemned the arrests in its latest statement, noting that an ongoing wave of arrests of journalists, bloggers and activists in recent days is intended to limit freedom of expression in the run up to the parliamentary elections.
Amnesty International specifically condemned the arrests of labor activist and blogger Esmail Jafari in Bushehr, social activist Ehsan Houshmand (Houshmandzadeh), sociologist and political activist Saeed Madani, blogger Mehdi Khazali, journalists Parastou Dokouhaki, Saham Bourghani, and Marzieh Rasouli, political activist and former student leader Saeed Razavi-Faghih, as well as Shahram Manouchehri and Mohammad Soleimaninia, and demanded their immediate and unconditional release. 
According to a report, yesterday morning dozens of security forces rushed into ward 350 in the Evin Prison, attacking prisoners and searching their belongings, forcing all prisoners, including those suffering from medical conditions, to spend hours outside in sub-freezing temperature and under snow. 
One prisoner, Mehdi Khazali, withstood the harsh treatment with his arm in a cast and more than two weeks into his hunger strike. 
People close to Mr. Khazali say that he has been in hunger strike for the past 24 days. He has been beaten and torture in prison and sustained damages to his neck and arm. ]]>
		</summary>
	</entry>
		
	<entry>
		<title>Dude Is a Thief, Not Incompetent</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.roozonline.com/english/news3/newsitem/archive/2012/february/04/article/dude-is-a-thief-not-incompetent.html"/>
		<updated>2012-02-04T19:47:11+01:00</updated>
		<published>2012-02-04T19:43:51+01:00</published>
		<id>tag:roozonline.com,2012:article35954</id>
		<author>
			<name>Ebrahim Nabavi</name>
		</author>
		<summary type="html" xml:base="http://www.roozonline.com/">
			<![CDATA[The Moroccan butcher who lives in Paris was finally convinced. Three years ago, when I first talked to him, he was a diehard fan of Ahmadinejad. 
He said, “Ahmadinejad is a very good man.” 
I said, “No, he is a very bad man.”
He glanced at my suit and my Mercedes Benz ride and said, “He is a bad person because he opposes America?”
I said, “Ahmadinejad is not opposed to America, he keeps writing letters to Bush to meet with him.”
He said, “But he is opposed to Israel.”
I said, “He is not opposed to Israel either. No president in the Middle East has helped as much as Ahmadinejad to solidify the hardliners in Israel and the spread of Zionism.” 
He said, “But he says good things.”
I said, “No, in Iran he doesn’t, he only says good things when he goes to the United States.” 
He said, “Why are you opposed to Ahmadinejad?”
I said, “Because his supporters rape Muslim men and women and he himself is a thief.”
He said, “He is a thief, like he helps the rich get richer?”
I said, “No, he is personally a thief.” 
He said, “What do you mean? He steals?”
I said, “I mean he takes his wife and kids and son-in-law and daughter-in-law and their families to America with people’s money and there they have fun with that money.”
He said, “No, that’s impossible.”
I said, “He has given all his relatives government posts with high salaries.”
He said, No, that’s impossible.”
I said, “He has appointed a billionaire as the interior minister in exchange for ten million dollars to use for his campaign, and then reappointed him to a different ministry.” 
He said, “No, that’s impossible.”
I said, “He sends his son to a university that charges 20 thousand dollars per semester for tuition. His son’s family lives in free government housing paid for by the people.”
He said, “So why don’t you replace him?”
I said, “No, that’s impossible.”
He said, “Go outside and protest.”
I said, “They beat and kills us. That’s impossible.”
He said, “Write about it in your newspapers.”
I said, “It’s illegal. That’s impossible.”
He said, “So why did you elect him?”
I said, “We didn’t, he became president by force.”
He said, “No, that’s impossible.”
I said, “Look, Hassan, in our country, everything is possible.”
He said, “Ok, you are right, but he says good things about Israel.” ]]>
		</summary>
	</entry>
		
	<entry>
		<title>Islamic Republic Retreats from Strategy of Threats</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.roozonline.com/english/news3/newsitem/archive/2012/january/23/article/islamic-republic-retreats-from-strategy-of-threats.html"/>
		<updated>2012-01-23T09:38:32+01:00</updated>
		<published>2012-01-23T09:34:43+01:00</published>
		<id>tag:roozonline.com,2012:article35772</id>
		<author>
			<name>Bahram Rafiei</name>
		</author>
		<summary type="html" xml:base="http://www.roozonline.com/">
			<![CDATA[Soon after the threatening remarks by senior commanders of Iran’s armed forces about shutting the Strait of Hormuz, and attacking the US Navy ships should they return to the Persian Gulf, the strong US warning that was communicated to Tehran has forced Iranian military officials to retreat from pursuing their threats and announce that the addition of a new US warship to the existing fleet in the region was a routine matter.
Speaking to the country’s official IRNA news agency, the deputy commander of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) responded to the addition of a new US warship to the Persian Gulf region by saying, “American warships and its armed forces have for many years been present in the Persian Gulf and the Middle East regions, and based on this, their decision to send new warships is not a new issue and this must be interpreted in light of their continued presence.”
General Hossein Salami added, “Of course this presence came about because of insecurity and tensions in the security of the region and its impact is felt in the security conditions of the Middle East, Eastern Mediterranean and particularly countries such as Iraq and Afghanistan.”
Referring to the earlier-announced war games of IRGC’s navy, Salami said the exercises would take place in the Persian Gulf at the “agreed time.”
Earlier, IRGC General Ali Fadavi had announced that “large sea war-games of the IRGC, code named “Payambar Azam 7” will be held in parts of the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz during the month of Bahman (January 21 till February 29). Even though Fadavi did not specify the exact days of the war games, Basirat website – the official website of the political office of the IRGC – had said that they would take place in the latter part of Bahman (i.e., after February 4).
These remarks come as US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta announced that US aircraft carrier USS Enterprise would be returning to the Middle East next month and would position itself in the Persian Gulf after sailing through the Strait of Hormuz. He also stressed that currently there were two other US warships in the Persian Gulf and added that the Enterprise’s addition carries a “clear message” to the Islamic republic of Iran.
<strong>New Defense Strategy</strong>
US aircraft carrier USS John Stennis had left the Persian Gulf earlier during or prior to the naval war-games of the Iranian navy in the Persian Gulf – code named Velayat 90. At the time, General Ataollah Salehi, the commander of Iran’s armed forces make a threatening remark that the aircraft carrier should not return to the Persian Gulf, adding that “we are not used to repeating our warnings and only warn one time.”
Following that, other Iranian commanders, such as General Salehi, made similar remarks and said that if Iranian oil was embargoed by the EU, they would shut the Strait of Hormuz. Prior to this, Yadollah Javani, ayatollah Khamenei’s advisor in the IRGC had said that Khamenei had said Iran should “respond to a threat with a threat,” adding that this was the new defense strategy of the country. Speaking to officers of the army’s Imam Ali War College on November 10, 2011, ayatollah Khamenei said, “We are a nation that will respond to any threat with full force. We are not a nation to sit and watch hollow materialistic powers that are rotten from the inside threaten us: We shall threaten in response to threats.”
Even though Iranian leaders have declared their ability to shut the Strait, none have said anything about their ability to keep this strategic strait shut.]]>
		</summary>
	</entry>
		
	<entry>
		<title>Don’t Turn the Strait of Hormuz into a Turkmanchai-Type Disaster</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.roozonline.com/english/news3/newsitem/archive/2012/january/23/article/dont-turn-the-strait-of-hormuz-into-a-turkmanchai-type-disaster.html"/>
		<updated>2012-01-23T09:32:21+01:00</updated>
		<published>2012-01-23T09:31:01+01:00</published>
		<id>tag:roozonline.com,2012:article35771</id>
		<author>
			<name>Farzaneh Roostaee</name>
		</author>
		<summary type="html" xml:base="http://www.roozonline.com/">
			<![CDATA[Those in Iran who are turning the Strait of Hormuz into an issue are perhaps not aware that if the waterway turns into a conflict, its final chapter will be very different from the way the eight year Iran-Iraq war ended by drinking a chalice of poison. Iranian right-wingers who dream of supremacy and grab any megaphone to scream about the Strait are probably doing it because the waterway has most likely become an election issue. They may be trying to send this message to the world: “We control this country, and not our domestic rivals,” and, “If a deal needs to be made, you need to make it with us.”
<strong>Recent Battles at the Strait</strong>
According to statistics from Lloyds of London, during the tanker war in the Persian Gulf between Iraq and Iran in the 1980s, some 546 commercial ships were attacked at the Strait which resulted in the death of 430 sailors.
In the May of 1987 US guided-missile frigate USS Stark was hit with two Iraqi anti-ship Exocet missiles near the Strait of Hormuz which turned into one of the mysteries of the war in the Persian Gulf. Four months earlier, Lebanese daily Alsharq had revealed that the US and Israel had sold anti-tank and anti-aircraft missiles to Iran in return of its assistance in freeing the American hostages in Lebanon. The Stark was hit to give the US a warning and drag it into the Strait of Hormuz and the Persian Gulf.
On April 1988, US guided-missile frigate USS Samuel B. Roberts struck a mine as it entered the Strait of Hormuz but did not sink. US frogmen found new mines bearing the inscription of “Iran Ajr” on them. In response to this, the US Navy launched Operation Praying Mantis. Through its execution, first the Sassan oil platform and the oil facilities at Siri island, both belonging to Iran, were destroyed. Then Iranian missile boats Sahand and Joshan were hit and sunk, killing 56 sailors. &nbsp;The Iranian frigate Sabalan too was hit with missiles and disabled. Two months later, US guided-missile cruiser USS Vincennes shot down an Iranian passenger plane killing all 290 on board.
<strong>Examining the Threats to Shut the Strait of Hormuz</strong>
In reality, the provocation to close the strait and pitting the international community against Iran was a military trap designed by Iraq against Iran. This is why even though Iraq attacked ships destined for Iran in the Persian Gulf, Iran did not respond for the first four years. 
Even during the height of the tanker war, traffic through the Strait of Hormuz declined only by 25 percent, but was never completely halted.
The main part of the two shipping channels of the Strait of Hormuz, in and out of the Persian Gulf passes through Iranian waters. A look at international maps of the Strait makes it clear that even though the boundaries between Oman and Iran have been delineated, the Strait of Hormuz belongs to Oman.
By disrupting the traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, one should expect a response from the international community. One should note that by challenging the Strait, the administration of Iranian Greater and Lesser Tomb islands, which are claimed by the UAE, may also be lost from Iran. It is also possible that the administration of the Strait may be handed over to an international committee in which Iran will have no role to play. 
Just two hundred years ago, the Iranian kings of the Qajar dynasty, lost significant parts of Iran’s northern territory to Tsarist Russia through the Golestan and Turkmanchai treaties. Iranians continue to be vengeful of the incompetence of Iranian kings. Similarly, future Iranian generations will not forgive those who through ignorance use security issues and the waterways of the country to battle their domestic opponents or who try to oppress the Iranian nation through fake justifications of crises at the Strait of Hormuz.]]>
		</summary>
	</entry>
		
	<entry>
		<title>Iran is not Iraq</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.roozonline.com/english/news3/newsitem/archive/2012/january/19/article/iran-is-not-iraq.html"/>
		<updated>2012-01-19T14:39:07+01:00</updated>
		<published>2012-01-19T14:38:51+01:00</published>
		<id>tag:roozonline.com,2012:article35746</id>
		<author>
			<name>Kazem Alamdari</name>
		</author>
		<summary type="html" xml:base="http://www.roozonline.com/">
			<![CDATA[The response of the Islamic republic of Iran to the latest Western sanctions against it has shown how critical oil revenues are to the survival of the regime in Tehran. Contrary to Saddam Hussein and Moammar Qaddafi, events have shown that Iranian leaders realize danger at the right time and retreat, unless an unpredicted event takes place or the country’s war-mongering forces see their interests otherwise. Some believe that economic sanctions do not force dictators to retreat. They point to Iraq to prove their point.
But Iran is not Iraq. If Iran is viewed to be similar to Iraq, then the question that is worthy of discussion is: What model does Iraq look like? 
Such mechanical comparisons lack any value. When social upheavals take place, people are involved. And people, which includes dictators, do not respond identically to crises or danger. An example of this is the Arab Spring: Four dictators lost power in four different ways. Similarly, Syria, Iran and other dictators can have their own models of change. Another example is Burma and Eastern European countries, which had their own distinct ways of change. There, we witnessed the Polish model, the Czech model, the Romanian model and Yugoslav model: all different. So saying Iran is similar to Iraq is just not right and a comparison will not produce similar results.
Iraq’s society and political structure during Saddam were completely different from Iran’s current structure. In Iraq bureaucrats, military technocrats and civilians were in power. Unlike Iran, Iraq regime did not depend on an organized section of the lower sectors of society. The Islamic republic is also not as uniform as Saddam’s regime. This alone is something that can thwart the type of genocide that took place in Iraq which killed thousands of people en masse through chemical bombings, hunger or illness. Such a policy in Iran would rapidly break the regime from inside. The Islamic republic has a great need to keep the masses that it has been dragging to political events through the payment of cash, to extract votes from the, and to hire mercenaries to punish, terrorize and suppress its opponents.
To continue to execute these projects the regime fanatically needs its oil revenue. This regime has already made its supporters dependant on state payments for providing political support and is fears the day when it will no longer be able to bring people into the streets to support it or engage in other religious or political events without such payments. The Iraqi regime never had the ability for such scenes and for mobilizing the masses and depended directly on its power of suppression. 
Oil revenues provide the needs of hundreds of religious organizations whose mission is propaganda for the state, and suppression of opponents. State subsidies too are political rather than economic in nature and have been devised to recruit people. Through this project, the poor in Iran have for the first time become official salary recipients of the government. It is a fact that some seven or eight member families had never seen a million Toman (a US Dollar today can bring about 1,800 Toman) while they have been receiving this amount every few months as a state subsidy. People who receive such money have to remain loyal to the regime, and they do. They also participate in regime organized elections and demonstrations. Why would they not? After all, this money is handed over to them without any official requests. Those who are given such stipends are among the most ignorant and needy sectors of Iranian society who are forced to sell their dignity for money.
A drop in oil revenues - which in any case constitute the bulk of the government’s income – can alienate those people whom the regime has retained for its political survival. The absence of such stipends to people can result in their inability to pay their regular utility bills, which would in turn result in still lesser income for the regime.
Awareness of this reality can convince the regime that it is better and less expensive for it to come to an agreement with the West and people. A war would not only not solve any of the current problems the regime faces, it would in fact add the consequences of the war to the above-mentioned existing problems. The value of the Rial would drop steeply even further and foreign exchange, which would fall because of lesser oil exports, would become scarcer as the national treasury rapidly drains further. 
The differences between the regime and the public in Iran are nothing new. As such problems heighten, people will hold officials responsible for their plight. The differences within the regime will increase as those circles inside the regime who believe in war as the solution to the problems increase their pressure and calls. This will result in a greater brain drain and deserters which like an avalanche will eat a part of society with each of its turns. Order and security will suffer. What is most likely to happen under such conditions is internal collapse and a coup to contain the power of the state. This is because some will try to come to terms with the West and people as a way to prevent the disintegration of the social structure. But they will be confronted by those who will be concerned about losing their monopolistic power and privileges. These people will prefer war rather than to compromise or to give any concession.
In addition to the differences listed above, it should be noted that Iran, unlike Iraq, has gone through a relatively recent revolution. Elections in Iran have never been as fake as they were in Saddam’s Iraq. Iran has experienced the reform administration (Mohammad Khatami’s presidency) and has a Green Movement calling for change. Differences within the regime today are greater than ever before. And as financial and economic corruption and state embezzlement continue to be exposed and as more efforts are made to cover up these evils, faith and belief in the regime by its own insiders is also weakening. Iran clearly has a large silent opposition which can rapidly grow if state control is loosened, all of which will speed up the forces of upheaval and change.
Another difference in Iran today is the eruption of the Arab Spring and the fall of some dictators. Saddam did not experience or witness these events and the Arab Spring. The leaders of the Iranian regime have the fate of Saddam, Gaddafi, Ben Ali, Mobarak, Abdollah Saleh and Bashar Assad in front of their eyes. They do not rule out the possibility of similar events in Iran. And in addition to all of these differences between Iran and Iraq, the impact of international sanctions on Iran will be very different than on Iraq. The most likely situation is that the leaders of the Iranian regime will try to superficially maintain the revolutionary and populist slogans and goals while secretly coming to terms with the West, thus preventing the current tension and pressure from reaching uncontrollable levels. 
But even in that scenario, the most that the regime can accomplish will be to contain and reduce the pressure from the West (by compromising with it). The economic and political issues, and the problem of legitimacy and deep public discontent will still continue. What can the regime do about these?]]>
		</summary>
	</entry>
		
	<entry>
		<title>Khamenei’s Advisors Respond to Obama’s Letter</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.roozonline.com/english/news3/newsitem/archive/2012/january/17/article/khameneis-advisors-respond-to-obamas-letter.html"/>
		<updated>2012-01-17T23:30:39+01:00</updated>
		<published>2012-01-17T23:28:40+01:00</published>
		<id>tag:roozonline.com,2012:article35686</id>
		<author>
			<name>Mohammad Reza Yazdanpanah</name>
		</author>
		<summary type="html" xml:base="http://www.roozonline.com/">
			<![CDATA[Two most senior advisors to Iran’s leader responded to US President Obama’s letter to ayatollah Khamenei. Seyed Yahya Rahim Safavi, an aide and advisor in military affairs and Ali Akbar Velayati, advisor in international affairs to ayatollah Khamenei separately confirmed the receipt of a letter from the US.
The New York Times on Friday reported that President Obama had sent a secret letter to the leader of the Islamic regime containing a warning over the Straits of Hormuz, calling it a Red Line not to be crossed. General Rahim Safavi, the former Revolutionary Guards commander and currently a military advisor to Khamenei responded publicly on Saturday saying, “If Iran is endangered,” the Islamic republic would use “political and other means” to defend itself.
He called the Straits of Hormuz “a strategic passage for world trade and for the world’s energy” and added that the Islamic republic viewed the security of the straits to be a “collective security.”
A few hours after Safavi’s comments, Velayati’s remarks were published in the country’s media. “Responsible authorities will comment and make their decision,” he is reported to have said. He did not identify who these authorities are but did add that there was “nothing new,” in the letter.
In the published remarks attributed to Rahim Safavi there is no mention or threat about closing the Straits of Hormuz by the Islamic republic if an embargo is placed on the purchase of Iranian oil, something that a number of Iranian officials had said recently. Velayati however did say that “oil is not a commodity that anyone can put an embargo on and Iran can easily sell its oil.” He added that there was “always more demand for Iran’s oil than the amount that was produced.”
<strong>The Confrontation Over the Straits of Hormuz</strong>
The debate over the embargo of Iranian oil is among the policies that the West is pursuing to halt Iran’s controversial nuclear program. Some senior Iranian political and military authorities had recently threatened that if Iran’s oil was embargoed, the country would shut the Straits of Hormuz and prevent the flow of any country’s oil through the passageway. 
Iran’s previous foreign minister Manoutchehr Mottaki, who said he did not know of the contents of the letter to ayatollah Khamenei, sounded a different note and said, “By talking about more sanctions, the Americans wanted to and were concerned about stepping into an uncertain area but they were checkmated by the Islamic republic. Then they tried to prevent some issues.”
Senior American civilian and military authorities had declared that they would not allow the Islamic republic to shut the Straits of Hormuz. The Prime Minister of the UK also said that Iran would not be allowed to threaten the security of the straits.
After the New York Times announced that President Obama had sent a letter to Iran’s leader in which he declared the Straits of Hormuz to be “Red Line” whose crossing the US would not tolerate, the spokesman for Iran’s foreign ministry Ramin Mehmanparast confirmed that the US ambassador to the UN had submitted a letter from the US President to Iran’s UN representative, while another copy was handed over to Iranian authorities by the Swiss ambassador in Tehran and that a third copy was received from Iraq’s president Jalal Talebani. He also said that “Iran was studying” whether to respond to the letter or not, and added, “If the decision is to respond, then it will be done appropriately.”
<strong>Saudi Arabia to Fill Iran’s Oil</strong>
In the meantime, Saudi oil minister announced that his country was ready to fill the oil gap if Iran’s oil were embargoed. Ali al-Naimi told CNN that all his country had to do was “open the oil taps just a little more” to immediately add 2 million more barrels a day to the world supply.
Saudi Arabia currently produced about 9.5 million barrels a day while Iran’s production stands at about 2.5 million barrels.
The Saudi announcement comes despite a warning by Iranian authorities a few days earlier to other oil producers not to raise their oil production. Iran had threatened that any country that raised its production to replace Iran’s oil would be responsible for any action that was taken regarding the embargo on Iranian oil. 
The foreign ministers of the European Union are scheduled to decide on embargoing Iran’s oil next Monday. The French foreign minister has said that all 27 members of the union have agreed in principle on the issue. The EU imports about 20 percent of its oil needs from Iran.]]>
		</summary>
	</entry>
		
	<entry>
		<title>Khamenei’s, IRGC’s and Rightwing Media: Retaliate with Assassinations!</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.roozonline.com/english/news3/newsitem/archive/2012/january/16/article/khameneis-irgcs-and-rightwing-media-retaliate-with-assassinations.html"/>
		<updated>2012-01-17T23:23:43+01:00</updated>
		<published>2012-01-16T08:43:09+01:00</published>
		<id>tag:roozonline.com,2012:article35662</id>
		<author>
			<name>Arash Bahmani</name>
		</author>
		<summary type="html" xml:base="http://www.roozonline.com/">
			<![CDATA[As the search for the perpetrators of the assassination of Iranian nuclear scientist Mostafa Ahmadi Roshan and the details of the attack continue, some authorities of the Islamic republic have called for reprisals against those they believe are responsible for the attacks.
Roshan, whom official Iranian media reported to be a deputy manager at a Natanz nuclear site, was assassinated last Wednesday by unknown individuals in Tehran. The manner of this latest assassination appeared to be similar to earlier attacks on the country’s nuclear scientists. 
In what is described as the most official response of the Islamic republic, Masoud Jazaeri, the deputy chairman of Iran’s armed forces announced that the Islamic republic was looking into ways to punish those responsible for the assassination. “The way we will punish the US, the Zionist regime and their accomplices” will hurt them, he said.
While he did not provide any details on the actual possible response, he did stress that the Islamic republic was in the process of reviewing “How to launch strategic assets of the Islamic republic” around the world. “Enemies of the Islamic republic and of progress of the Iranian nation should not have any doubts about us. A timely and appropriate punitive response will be provided to the US, the Zionist regime and their accomplices,” he stressed.
Earlier, Iran’s leader seyed Ali Khamenei had issued a statement declaring that the Islamic republic would never walk away from punishing the perpetrators of this crime and the individuals who were behind the event. He called the assassination of Roshan “cowardly” and “a dirty crime” which had taken place with “the scheming of the CIA and MOSSAD” (Israel’s secret service) adding, “They will fail in this horrendous act as well, and they will not attain their dirty and wicked goal.”
Separately, ayatollah Khamenei’s representative at Kayhan group of newspapers, Hossein Shariatmadari, published an editorial in the daily in which he asks why the regime did not respond in kind to these terrorist acts. “The assassination of Israeli military men and officials is an easy task,” he wrote. “Today, the Islamic republic has plenty of brave and ready-to-act <em>fedayeen</em> (those willing to sacrifice their life) across the world who will wholeheartedly undertake to punish them,” he asserted.
Calls for reprisals against the West also made their way to the Basij militia organization that operates under the command of the Revolutionary Guards. In a statement that was issued after Roshan’s assassination, Basij wrote, “Enemies should know that they are digging their own grave with these actions and they should await a decisive response from the Hezbollah nation.”
Some Principlist (this is the group that claims allegiance to the initial goals of the 1979 revolution and today is split among those supporting ayatollah Khamenei and those supporting Mahmoud Ahmadinejad) media also towed the same line. One of them quoted a security official to have said, “Iran’s security community is well positioned to engage in reprisal activities as a response to the assassinations carried out by Western security agencies. Iran’s response shall be overseas and beyond the region. The planners of these projects should never be allowed to feel security anywhere in the world.”]]>
		</summary>
	</entry>
		
	<entry>
		<title>Assassination Within Two Feet from the Ministry of Intelligence</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.roozonline.com/english/news3/newsitem/archive/2012/january/14/article/assassination-within-two-feet-from-the-ministry-of-intelligence.html"/>
		<updated>2012-01-14T23:50:52+01:00</updated>
		<published>2012-01-14T23:47:28+01:00</published>
		<id>tag:roozonline.com,2012:article35629</id>
		<author>
			<name>Mohammad Reza Yazdanpanah</name>
		</author>
		<summary type="html" xml:base="http://www.roozonline.com/">
			<![CDATA[A manager at a key nuclear site which is part of Iran’s controversial nuclear program in Natanz was assassinated earlier this week on the very same street that houses the headquarters of the country’s all invasive Intelligence Ministry. Official news sites presented Mostafa Ahmadi Roshan to be a trade deputy at a nuclear enrichment plant in Nataz, in the province of Isfahan.
This is an important nuclear site in Iran’s nuclear program that has been widely present in the international media coverage of Iran because of its enrichment activities that have been questioned by international agencies and governments.
Tehran has been asserting that top secret information about the country’s nuclear program including names of some of its scientists and managers in the nuclear projects has been leaked by international organizations, such as the IAEA and thus being involved in the recent assassinations. It also accused the US and Israel of being behind the assassinations.
After this week’s assassination of Roshan, Iran’s semi-official Mehr news agency reported that the scientist had been recently interviewed by IAEA inspectors. According to the report by this news source, the presence of the names of some of Iran’s players in the nuclear program on the UN Security Council blacklist and IAEA documents, along with the recent interview of Roshan by IAEA inspectors, increases the likelihood of some form of IAEA involvement in the attack or information leak.
This view comes despite the strong denouncement by the American and British governments of the assassination and denials of any involvement in the explosion that killed the scientist.
Israel is the only government that had earlier declared that it had the assassination of scientists and members of Iran’s nuclear program on its agenda as a way to prevent the Islamic republic from acquiring nuclear weapons. Still, it has not taken responsibility for any of the assassinations that have shaken Iran.
<strong>Fingers Point to IAEA and Israel</strong>
Prior to this incident, Iran’s Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) had announced that they would be taking up the responsibility of protecting the members of the country’s nuclear program, which was subsequently approved by the Majlis.
In a letter to IAEA Director General Yukiya Amano, Iran’s representative at the nuclear watchdog Ali Asqar Soltanieh wrote that by “publishing the names of Iranian scientists and experts, the agency had placed these individuals at risk of being assassinated and at the disposal of spy agencies of Israel and the United States.”
He further said, “The names of Iranian nuclear scientists and specialists who had engaged in committed cooperation with the IAEA were leaked outside and were placed on the illegal list of EU sanctions and the UN Security Council.”
By saying that these lists were the source of foreign intelligence agencies in the latter’s plans to assassinate Iranian nuclear scientists, Soltanieh added, “The international community has witnessed the new ugly phenomena of assassinations of Iranian nuclear scientists and specialists by terrorist groups supported by the US and Israel.”
The spokesperson for Iran’s Supreme National Security Council and Foreign Policy at the Majlis Kazem Jalali echoed similar words when he said that the assassinations indicated that the information that the Islamic republic provides to international agencies is provided to “enemies.” “While organizations like the IAEA should be trusted places for nations, why are the secrets of nations and governments put at the disposal of terrorists,” he asked. He said the IAEA should not have released the names of individuals associated with Iran’s nuclear program.
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s first deputy, Mohammad-Reza Rahimi, attributed the assassinations to Israel. Speaking after a cabinet session, he said, “This terrorist act took place by agents of the Zionist regime (a reference to Israel) and those who claim to be fighting terrorism, whereas in fact they have taken up a fight against humanity and decent aspects of humans as a way to eliminate scientists from providing their service to humanity.”
Ramin Mehmanparast, the foreign ministry spokesperson also condemned the assassination of Roshan. “We shall pursue these inhuman practices and complain to the relevant organizations and authorities,” he said. He further said that the silence by Western countries and supporters of Israel over the physical elimination of Iranian nuclear scientists can mean their indirect alignment or Israel’s sense of confidence that there would be no serious response by other countries over such terrorist actions.
Domestic media reported that a bystander who was injured in explosion that killed Roshan died in hospital. 
According to Iran’s official news agency IRNA, Roshan was a member of Sharif University student Basij (Iran’s official militia organized under the IRGC) who had graduated in chemical engineering in 2001. The agency also reported that during a Majlis session, MPs chanted death to the US, death to Israel and death to hypocrites (a word Iranian officials use for the Mujahedin Khalq Organization). In a speech on the floor, Shahabedin Sadr, the second Majlis Speaker deputy said “World Arrogance” (a term the Iranian regime uses for the United States) was behind the assassination. This is despite US Secretary of State Hilary Clinton’s express denial of any US involvement in the assassination. In her statement on the subject she also reiterated the concern of the international community over Iran’s nuclear activities. Tommy Vietor, the spokesperson for the US National Security Council also condemned the attack and said the US had “absolutely nothing to do” with it. Britain also issued a statement condemning the assassination on Roshan.
The assassination of Roshan brings the number of people involved in Iran’s nuclear program who have been killed in Tehran to three. In January 2010 Masoud Ali Mohammadi, a physics university professor and a researcher in the nuclear program was killed in a similar attack in Tehran. The assassination of Roshan took place exactly on the second anniversary of Mohammadi’s attack. The other attack took place in November of 201 when Majid Shahriyari, also a physics university professor at Beheshti University was assassinated in Tehran near the school. Fereidoon Abbasi Davani, another physics professor from the same university was also attacked on the same day, but has survived the explosion. The Islamic regime has blamed Western countries, particularly the United States and Israel for these attacks.
This last attack took place on the corner of a row of buildings belonging to the headquarters of the ministry of intelligence of Iran but the motor bikers who carried out the attack, according to Iran’s official accounts, managed to flee the scene after the explosion.]]>
		</summary>
	</entry>
		
	<entry>
		<title>Sakineh’s Attorney’s Fate: Torture and Prison</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.roozonline.com/english/news3/newsitem/archive/2012/january/11/article/sakinehs-attorneys-fate-torture-and-prison.html"/>
		<updated>2012-01-11T21:53:33+01:00</updated>
		<published>2012-01-11T21:50:17+01:00</published>
		<id>tag:roozonline.com,2012:article35608</id>
		<author>
			<name>Fereshteh Ghazi</name>
		</author>
		<summary type="html" xml:base="http://www.roozonline.com/">
			<![CDATA[An Azerbaijani civil and media activist has been charged with espionage for Iran’s northern neighbor, the Republic of Azerbaijan, and recruiting informers for the intelligence service of that country. At the same time, the defense attorney for Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani has been subjected to severe torture in Tabriz’s central prison and continues to be on the non-visitation list.
Naser Deraz-Shamshir, known as Aidin Moghanli, has been in detention for the last five months while his family members avoid speaking to the media because of pressure from security and intelligence officers. Defense attorney Naghi Mahmoudi who represents many Azeri (Iranian Azerbaijanis) prisoners and detainees told Rooz that Deraz-Shamshir has been charged with espionage for the Republic of Azerbaijan.
Naser Deraz-Shamshir was arrested on July 27, 2011 in the north western city of Ardebil (capital of Ardebil province), was initially kept in Tabriz’s intelligence detention center and is now at the city’s central prison. He has till today not been allowed to meet his family members.
In an exclusive interview with Rooz, Naghi Mahmoudi said, “Mr. Deraz-Shamshir’s case was initially at the general and revolutionary court in the city of Ardebil and he himself was kept at the city’s intelligence center. Then about a month ago, his dossier was sent to Tabriz’s Revolutionary court and he was transferred to the city’s intelligence detention center, where he remains today.”
Mahmoudi said the three charges filed against him are, “Propaganda against the regime, espionage for the Republic of Azerbaijan, and the recruitment of informers for the Azerbaijan Republic intelligence service.”
Asked about the evidence to support these charges, the attorney said, “Mr. Deraz-Shamshir took part in a reporting training course in the city of Baku (in the Republic of Azerbaijan) and then introduced a number of media activists to participate in the same course. This act of referring others to take the journalism course is the basis of the espionage charge and that of recruiting informers.”
“Unfortunately, political and security charges that are raised against individuals in the Islamic republic of Iran lack any real basis. Mr. Deraz-Shamshir’s participation in a purely training course for journalists is the cause of this heavy charge against him. This is a dangerous issue because not only can he get a heavy sentence for it, it can also deter others from participating in other specialized training courses out of fear of arrest and imprisonment,” Mahmoudi continued.
Mahmoudi mentioned his experience with cases involving civil and political activists in the past and said, “With the experience that I have gathered over the years on this issue, I can clearly say that none of the political and security charges against these individuals are based on any legal documents or evidence but simply on speculation, conjecture and exaggerations shaped by the intelligence service, which result in heavy prison sentences.” He added that no date has been announced yet for Mr. Deraz-Shamshir’s trial and that he remains on the non-visit list of prisoners. 
Mahmoudi then named two other clients, Mehdi Hamidi Shafagh and Taghi Salahshoor, Iranian Azerbaijani activists who are kept in Tabriz’ central prison and who have been charged with participating in protests over the drying up of Orumieh Lake. They have so far had one trial hearing and await a second one.
<strong>Javid Hootan Kian Still on Non-Visit List</strong>
This defense attorney named another of his clients, Javid Hootan Kian, the imprisoned defense attorney for Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani who he said continues to be kept at Tabriz’s central prison and is on the non-visitation list. Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani is the famed woman who has been sentenced to death by stoning. Mr. Hootan was arrested last year along with Sajad Ghaderzadeh, Sakineh Ashtiani’s son, along with two German reporters in Iran. The German reporters were subsequently released and returned to Germany and Ghaderzadeh was acquitted. Javid Hootan was initially sentenced to 11 years of prison and a 5-year ban on working in the legal field, a ruling that was subsequently reduced to six years. He is serving his sentence in Tabriz’s central prison. Mr. Mahmoudi who represented Hootan told Rooz, “Mr. Hootan was acquitted from charges of ertedad (heresy) and espionage but he was sentenced to one year of prison for engaging in propaganda against the regime plus another five years for misrepresenting himself as being an international attorney, a representative of human rights, etc. He continues to serve his sentence while being denied the right to have a defense attorney in addition to being denied any visitations by his relatives and family members.” He said that he did meet with Hootan last March in the Tabriz prison when he passed his power of attorney documents to me, something that the judge in the case strongly opposed, thus in reality denying Mr. Hootan of legal representation. “His family members are under severe pressure not to talk to the media and he himself is under bad conditions in prison. It is undeserving that human rights activists and media ignore the conditions and fate of this respectable attorney,” Mahmoudi said. He also said that when he saw his client in March, his hands and feet showed cigarette burn signs, adding, “He had been severely tortured and was in no good health at all. His nose and a number of his teeth were broken and his testicles were injured. Unfortunately human rights groups have not paid the attention that this activist is worthy of as he continues to be deprived of his basic and legal rights even as a prisoner.”]]>
		</summary>
	</entry>
		
	<entry>
		<title>Khamenei Predicts “Public Intervention”</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.roozonline.com/english/news3/newsitem/archive/2012/january/10/article/khamenei-predicts-public-intervention.html"/>
		<updated>2012-01-10T09:03:10+01:00</updated>
		<published>2012-01-10T08:58:10+01:00</published>
		<id>tag:roozonline.com,2012:article35565</id>
		<author>
			<name>Bahram Rafiei</name>
		</author>
		<summary type="html" xml:base="http://www.roozonline.com/">
			<![CDATA[At a time when the protestors of the controversial 2009 presidential elections, along with reformist political parties and personalities have been advocating non-participation in the March 2 parliamentary elections, the supreme leader of the Islamic state has called those who oppose participating in the elections “pawns and foot-soldiers” of the “infidel and oppression” front and foresees that the forthcoming elections will be “lively,” with a 65 percent participation and that “the intervention of people will be enemy-busting.”
In his speech on Monday to a group of state officials and the people from Qom, ayatollah Khamenei focused on the forthcoming Majlis elections. Pointing to the importance of the event, he said, “From a long time ago the center and base of the infidels and imperialists, all the way down to their peons and foot soldiers and inside and outside Iran, there has been a wide effort to reduce the level of public participation in the Majlis elections. But with the help and grace of God, public presence will be enemy-busting.”
Elsewhere in his talk he said that the event would be the source of “new joy and fresh blood in the body” of the Islamic state, cautiously adding that along with this, there would also be some “negative events” which he said had to be “watched to be prevented”.
After that introduction, the supreme leader characterized the dispute-ridden 2009 presidential election as providing him with the “best memories in the massive and amazing presence of forty million people at the ballot box” and the “worst memories about political fraud committed by some unfit, ignorant and some antagonistic people in the elections.”
He acknowledged that there could always be some people who protest an election, adding that “the law had identified the course” for such an event. “In the 2009 election, some people had chosen the path of breaking the law, imposing costs on the country and people, making the enemy happy and implementing plans desired by the enemy. But they did not succeed because people were present. So long as people are in the field, nobody in the country can advance unlawful acts,” he said.
These remarks by Iran’s supreme leader come despite the broad outcry by protestors to the last presidential elections about the perpetration of “massive electoral fraud” and execution of an “electoral coup” during the elections, calling for the “annulment of the election results, release of political prisoners and political parties, end to the closure of media, expression of sympathy with people, and the launch of new elections.”
During more recent months, Mir-Hossein Mousavi was the first who said in September “One could not be optimistic about the elections and participation in them.” Then in December, Mehdi Karoubi announced his opposition to participation in the Majlis election and in a meeting with his wife said, “They want to organize an imposed election and by rejecting candidates and annulling the results of some voting districts and filling the ballot boxes with fictitious voters, … repeat the plan that was executed in the 2009 elections.”
Karoubi, Mousavi and Zahra Rahnavard whom ayatollah Khamenei has called “unfit,” “ignorant,” and “at times antagonistic,” and whom “people in the field” prevented from achieving their goals, were illegally and without any trial or even charges arrested and have been held under house arrest since February 14, 2011.
Political parties and personalities, including political prisoners, have expressly said since the 2009 elections and more so recently that they would not participate in the upcoming Majlis elections and would not support any group or candidate either.
<strong>Election Fears</strong>
In his speech, ayatollah Khamenei also addressed the candidates for the Majlis and said, “Competition is not the same as animosity and mutual accusations. Competition does not mean proving yourself by negating others. It is also not making unlawful promises to acquire votes.”
With the last elections on his mind, the leader also said, “Officials who are responsible for elections, in the government, the ministry of interior and the Guardians Council have to make every effort to protect the public vote and ensure a healthy election. Everyone should know that there is nothing above the law.”
“The association of candidates with the centers of wealth and power is very destructive,” he said. 
Ayatollah Khamenei has made a number of warnings regarding interference in elections. Earlier, in the month of May/June when his differences with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad came into full public view and as the leader’s close appointees make public accusations of the president’s efforts to interference in the 2009 presidential election, speaking to a group of Majlis representatives he warned that “nobody should interference in elections in any way so that process would take its lawful course and the Majlis would convene based on the votes of people.
The ayatollah’s emphasis on a “lively” public participation in the upcoming elections comes amid the announcement by reformers and protestors of the 2009 elections that they would not vote in March while the only group that would be participating are the Principlists who have remained divided despite frequent efforts to unify them, with some supporting the president while others opposing him as they support the supreme leader. Just last Saturday, Ali Saeedi, the representative of ayatollah Khamenei in the Revolutionary Guards claimed that “polls indicate that 60 to 65 percent of the public would participate in the elections for the ninth Majlis, disregarding those who advocate boycotting it.”]]>
		</summary>
	</entry>
		
	<entry>
		<title>They Were Not Allowed to Even Say Goodbye</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.roozonline.com/english/news3/newsitem/archive/2012/january/09/article/they-were-not-allowed-to-even-say-goodbye.html"/>
		<updated>2012-01-09T10:23:25+01:00</updated>
		<published>2012-01-09T10:18:40+01:00</published>
		<id>tag:roozonline.com,2012:article35547</id>
		<author>
			<name>Kaveh Ghoreishi</name>
		</author>
		<summary type="html" xml:base="http://www.roozonline.com/">
			<![CDATA[In an exclusive interview with Rooz, human rights activist Asieh Amini who has been involved in gathering information about secret executions in Mashhad’s Vakilabad prison, announced, “Many executed prisoners (in Vakilabad) learned of their fate just a few hours before being executed and were not allowed to say goodbye to their family members.”
Just two months after the secretary of Iran’s human rights committee and the advisor to the head of the judiciary told reporters in New York that “No secret executions take place in Iran,” the International Campaign on Human Rights in Iran, including some Iranian human rights activists, published the details of the execution of 101 prisoners in secret in Vakilabad.
At the same time, Catherine Ashton, the representative of the EU for foreign affairs and security policy, expressed her deep concern about the growing number of executions in Iran and called for their suspension, including the sentence on Sakineh Ashtiani.
The average number of executions in Iran since the beginning of 2011 has been 2 per day, which places the Islamic republic of Iran as the country with the second highest number of executions in the world after China.
<strong>Mass Executions in Visitation Halls</strong>
This is the first time that the International Campaign on Human Rights in Iran is publishing the names of 101 victims of secret executions in the Vakilabad prison of Mashhad. It has requested the judiciary of the Islamic republic to immediately end secret executions and stop executions altogether.
The published list contains names of 101 individuals who are said to have been executed in the prison between June 19, 2010 and December 20, 2010. This list, which has been published along with a brief report, is the first document that presents the identities and details of many of those that have been secretly executed. The report categorizes the executions as “secret,” “massive,” and “unannounced,” adding that their trials took place without the presence of attorney’s or relatives of the victims, and that these relatives had not been informed of the executions for days that ranged from one to several after the event.
Ms. Amini believes that the actual number of secret executions exceeds the 101 number whose list has been published. She points to statements made by officials of Iran’s judiciary in the province of Khorasan and the remarks of some Friday prayer leaders in the province who she says have implicitly acknowledged in various ways the existence of secret executions.
Last October, Mohammad Bagher Bagheri, the deputy chief of the judiciary in South Khorasan province implicitly acknowledged the secret mass executions of drug criminals in a Birjand prison, the center of South Khorasan province and without mentioning similar executions in 2009 and the current year, said that 140 drug related criminals had been executed in 2010 in that prison. The Campaign said that none of the executions mentioned by Bagheri were ever announced in 2010.
While the Campaign has recorded 471 secret executions in Mashhad and other cities between January 2-11 until now, other sources point to a larger number of victims. Ms. Amini says, “From evidence gathered by witnesses and others gathered by our friends, we succeeded in collecting details on 101 victims. But we are certain that the total number of executions far exceeds this number.”
According to the Campaign, based on evidence gathered by local activists, the prisoners who were executed secretly in Vakilabad prison apparently did not know they were to be executed until the arrival of their hour of time. Officials told the victims to write their wills and take their last bath just before they were executed.
According to the report, authorities of Vakilabad hung the prisoners at about sunset in an open air hall that led to the visitation hall. In order to keep the hangings secret, officials turned off the telephone lines of the facility hours before the executions. Ms. Amini also said that even after the prisoners were informed that they would be executed, they were denied the right to inform their relatives of their fate. She said that the report that the Committee has prepared has been sent to various human rights organizations. 
Shirin Ebadi, Iran’s Nobel Peace Prize winner commented on the report and asked why the Iranian government used this method of execution so eagerly. “Such a measure only creates terror and fear among the populace and has political utility while all evidence indicates that this method of punishment and its increase does not reduce the number of crimes related to drug trafficking.
The head of Iran’s judiciary Sadegh Amoli Larijani had said last December, “It is claimed that secret executions take place enmasse in Iran but I categorically announce this to be a complete lie. All death sentences are reported to the head of the judiciary. If they really have information that such secret executions take place somewhere, they should announce them so we can investigate.” Now that the list of 101 executions in Vakilabad has been published, the question is will the judiciary investigate.
Ms. Amini says it is not clear. “In the past, they used to say that some judges had unilaterally decided to stone sentenced prisoners. Today, it is not clear whether the authorities are not informed of such executions or that there is a cover up,” she said.
In his report, the special UN rapporteur on human rights in Iran wrote that the number of mass secret executions in Iranian prisons was “alarming” and adds that most of these executions take place without prior knowledge of family members or lawyers.]]>
		</summary>
	</entry>
		
	<entry>
		<title>Happy New Year to the Youth</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.roozonline.com/english/news3/newsitem/archive/2012/january/05/article/happy-new-year-to-the-youth.html"/>
		<updated>2012-01-05T07:48:43+01:00</updated>
		<published>2012-01-05T07:46:50+01:00</published>
		<id>tag:roozonline.com,2012:article35504</id>
		<author>
			<name>Mehrangis Kar</name>
		</author>
		<summary type="html" xml:base="http://www.roozonline.com/">
			<![CDATA[The New Year arrived along with the embargo on Iran’s Central Bank, the war games of the Iranian regime, and the threats to the Straits of Hormuz, the last of which can be the spot for adventures that are not in the interest of anyone. The actions of Iran and the US are not promoting world peace. Peace is threatened through their games whose rules change every moment as they adjust to the domestic battles. Iran’s regime is prisoner to the slogans it has been accumulating for years and has become unable to adjust these slogans to correspond to the realities of today’s world. The Iranian mind is captive to slogans that are condemned to be eventually changed but at a great cost to the Iranian nation. Young Iranians who speak from inside the Revolutionary Guards Corps and Basij militia about international politics and take positions demonstrate their lack of understanding of the real world and a proper view of the effective players around them. When they engage in political discussions regarding relations with the West and the war, they treat the issues in historic mythical terms. From their perspective, there is devil on one side which is bloody, while Mr. Khamenei stands on the other side with his troops who are presented as victims and sufferers. And he wants to bury the devil. Iranian Basij kids have been kept in an immature political vicious circle of good versus bad. There is no alternative middle in their brainwashed minds. They see themselves to be righteous while all others are evil. They have been indoctrinated to view the world unrealistically. The zeal to engage in war in the spirit of these youth cannot bring respect to Iran or the world, and it cannot bring welfare, happiness and security to the Iranian people.
They innocently say: We did not expect Obama to act this way.
Amid the complex game of international politics, this small complaint is a sufficient gesture to raise alarm about the future which these young people want to build and be part of. While the Iranian regime possesses a colossal budget and educational technology, it has not wanted to tell the young Guardsmen and Basijis that when Mr. Obama sent Nowruz greetings to them the gesture did not mean that he would disregard the national interests of the superpower he represents in the world and that he had turned into subservience to Mr. Khamenei. Our young Guardsmen and Basijis were not taught that before they step into the boxing ring they must have an understanding of their own power and that of their adversary. It is not without reason that in the tradition of Iranian classical wrestling there were individuals around the wrestling mat whose job was precisely to prevent a fight between completely unequal rivals. Today, Mr. Chavez is encouraging Iranian youth from the edge of the wrestling mat. The beast of war with a superpower should not be imposed on the young Iranian Basijis and Guardsmen whose energy and abilities can be used to provide welfare and professional and legal security to the nation. The pride and human dignity of these youth will be crushed if they are caught in an unequal war. Instead of building their pride, they will be caught in a slipping unequal war while the swords of other oil rich entities in the region watch. The pride will turn into defeat and this rich resource of the country will turn to depression. Iran will remain alone in this game. And just as loneliness can result in suicide, the fate of regimes that live under grandiose illusions and charge the youth with the same myths can move in a direction exactly opposite to their slogans. The fire that will be started through this illusion will not hurt the regime alone but will become a load on the shoulders of a nation which for the last 33 years has either given lives or raised its hands to the heavens so that reason may return to its rulers.
The year 2012 will be a year with many misfortunes for Iranians. The US is bent on destroying the ailing economy of Iran while the Iranian regime presents this American game foolishly and provides the US justification for its actions. The million Iranian émigrés who live outside the country are only one testament of the thoughtless behavior of the Iranian regime while the rest of the population that sits at empty food tables inside the country and awaits its turn to visit a prison to see their loved ones is the other testament. A regime that has itself created groups and groups of opponents and prisoners and refugees, and despite the enormous wealth at its disposal has embarked on nothing but imports from China burying domestic production as it chops off the hands of simple destitute thieves, is providing justification for the plans and actions of the US while its opponents outside the country have learned through experience and act against a Western war with Iran and display their detestation for it. But war can come despite such protests.
In this psychological battle, the pressure of war is growing. Individuals whose pains and cries of peace are not heard, are the very immigrants outside Iran who condemn war even as Iranians inside the country condemn the émigrés. This is a group that is neither happy living outside its homeland nor does it have the possibility of going back home. This group is perplexed on how to respond to those inside the country who have put their hopes in war in order to get rid of the regime that has imposed itself on them. The Islamic republic of Iran is expert at creating refugees, poverty, corruption, divisions, cruelty, and injustice. It has also created a sizeable population - mostly in Iran – which openly curses the émigrés for their positions and which says: You are in a safe place: Do you really think this cruel regime will leave without a war?
So here we are watching all this, listening to these cries and not knowing how to respond to the non-Basij and non-Guardsmen sufferers inside Iran who have become supportive of war and who have no fear of being hurt as a way to get rid of the regime over them. 
These are hard times but 2012 will be harder.
Happy New Year]]>
		</summary>
	</entry>
		
	<entry>
		<title>The Arrests of 2009 and Khamenei’s Orders</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.roozonline.com/english/news3/newsitem/archive/2011/december/30/article/the-arrests-of-2009-and-khameneis-orders.html"/>
		<updated>2011-12-30T01:35:45+01:00</updated>
		<published>2011-12-30T01:33:25+01:00</published>
		<id>tag:roozonline.com,2011:article35407</id>
		<author>
			<name>Bahram Rafiei</name>
		</author>
		<summary type="html" xml:base="http://www.roozonline.com/">
			<![CDATA[Even though some senior officials of the Islamic republic of Iran had previously implicitly acknowledged that the massive arrests of political and civil activists and street protestors in Tehran after the massively disputed 2009 elections were on orders of the country’s supreme leader ayatollah Khamenei and that he had been involved in most detail aspects of the crackdown, now the advisor to the Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) commander more expressly confirmed that the arrests and the crackdown of the protestors were carried out from the very first hours after the elections on direct orders of the supreme leader.
Speaking to a group of student Basij militiamen, Mohammad Hossein Safar Herandi spoke about the reason why leaders of what is now known as the Green Movement, Mir-Hossein Mousavi and Mehdi Karoubi were not arrested then. “Right in the beginning of the sedition (sedition is the term Iranian officials use for the massive protests against the rigged elections of 2009) some believed that the protests would die with the arrest of a few individuals, which was naïve because it was clear that the events were not largely driven by the statements of these two (Mousavi and Karoubi) and were in fact beyond their control,” he said. 
By confirming that the arrests of political and civil activists were on orders of ayatollah Khamenei, Herandi, who at one time was the chief editor of the right-wing Kayhan newspaper and is now the advisor to the IRGC commander, said, “The wise view of the leader was that the leadership of the sedition was outside the country. He believed that the channel that connected the seditionists to the outside world had to be discovered. This led to the arrest of a group of individuals 90 percent of whom were subsequently released with warnings and only 10 percent were interrogated and prosecuted.”
Last year too Herandi had said to members of the Basij that some of the seditionists had been used by foreigners as more than 3000 individuals had been identified whose cases were closed after they were told of their charges.
Herandi who has also been the head of the IRGC’s political office also made a reference to the sham trials of political and civil activists that have been held since 2009 and said that some “100 individuals who were the key organizers of the sedition and criminals had been found and sentenced guilty, thus drying up the roots of the problem.”
Among others who had in the past made references to Khamenei’s role in the arrests is the attorney general and spokesperson of the judiciary cleric Gholam-Hossein Mohseni Ejei. He had said that the leader had played the highest role in identifying what he called “the correct source of the problem” and said that ayatollah Khamenei had been involved in the issue even before the 2009 elections till today.
This former intelligence minister had also revealed earlier that Khamenei continuously gave instructions and detailed advice to intelligence officials about the street protestors since the demonstrations began. “He stressed to the intelligence folks to be attentive to those they arrested, those in the streets, and to those that were being tried. If you go to people’s houses, your behavior with family members of the violators has to be different. In other words, he (supreme leader) repeatedly gave instructions to officials not to cross the divine limits. Such talks were also made in the public but privately they were much more transparent, clear and with greater emphasis,” he said.
Herandi also said that Khamenei knew the details of what had been going on in the Kahrizak prison, which was subsequently ordered to be shut because of criminal activities in it. “Reports had reached the leader that conditions were not right in Kahrizak and he ordered it shut. But this was not the whole issue. Before the leader was informed that conditions there were not right, he had ordered that no more prisoners be sent there. In other words he was the first person to order that nobody should be sent to Karizak. “
In October/November of 2009 a senior intelligence official from the IRGC had also revealed similar involvement by Khamenei. Speaking at&nbsp; clerical seminar in Mashhad, a General Moshafagh accused “Hashemi Rafsanjani, Mohammad Khatami, Mohammad Mousavi Khoeniha, Mir-Hossein Mousavi and reformist groups such as the Association of Combatant Clerics (Majmae Rohaniyoone Mobarez), the Iran Participation Front (Jebhe Mosharekat), the Association of Groups for the Imam’s Path (Majmae Niroohaye Khate Imam), the Organization of the Mujahedin of the Islamic Revolution (Sazemane Mojahedin Enghelab Eslami), the Executives of Construction (Kargozaran Sazandeghi) and others of plotting to overthrow the Islamic republic and to topple ayatollah Khamenei’s leadership.” “We discovered this issue and destroyed their (reformists) efforts and prevented them from continuing them,” he added. And like Herandi, he too at the time had said that the protestors were driven and guided by foreigners from outside the country.
But more significantly was the fact that Moshafagh also said in his talk that a group had been formed to identify the seditionists a few months before the actual presidential elections of 2009, indicating that there had been talks and most likely a plan to engineer the elections and then engage in damage control. The Iran Participation Front later used Moshafagh’s remarks in its letter to the head of the judiciary and pointed to it as proof that the elections had been pre-engineered and that an “electoral coup” had taken place by military institutions under the command of the supreme leader. 
Following the arrests of members of the Participation Front, among others, in the aftermath of the 2009 elections and protests, the group wrote in its letter that the remarks by the IRGC official made it very clear that the whole crackdown and arrests had been pre-planned well before the June 2009 elections, thus negating the legitimacy of the trials in which the leaders of various groups were sentenced to prison terms. The letter also expressly said that Ahmadinejad had not only rigged the elections but had orchestrated a coup to remain in power.
This letter was not only ignored by the judiciary but soon after its publication, seven leaders of the Front who had at the time been released from prison on bail – which allowed them to write the letter - were summoned back to serve their terms.]]>
		</summary>
	</entry>
		
	<entry>
		<title>IRGC Members Should Run for Majlis</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.roozonline.com/english/news3/newsitem/archive/2011/december/29/article/irgc-members-should-run-for-majlis.html"/>
		<updated>2011-12-29T01:25:33+01:00</updated>
		<published>2011-12-29T01:23:16+01:00</published>
		<id>tag:roozonline.com,2011:article35406</id>
		<author>
			<name>Bahram Rafiei</name>
		</author>
		<summary type="html" xml:base="http://www.roozonline.com/">
			<![CDATA[As the number of former IRGC (Revolutionary Guards) members in the Majlis has been growing since they first entered the body in 2005 and took over key committees, this week the representative of ayatollah Khamenei in the force called on for more members of the force to get into the consultative assembly so that they could, in his words, “take strong and focused positions on important decisions.”
Speaking a day after his press conference on the forthcoming elections in March, Cleric Ali Saeedi said, “There is no legal problem with the presence of members of the armed forces or those in the intelligence agencies, and as provided by law of commanders and other members of the armed forces in the Majlis after their resignations from their positions and membership in the IRGC.”
“In view of the need to have specialists in the Majlis, including areas of defense-security … members of the armed forces that have expertise in military affairs too can become candidates for the assembly,” he said.
Saeedi said that the nature of the work that IRGC members performed was similar to that of Majlis representatives and added, “The Guards and Majlis representatives defend the revolution in different ways. Therefore, defense activities can continue in the Majlis in the same fashion after membership in the IRGC is terminated.”
In explaining his interpretation of work in the IRGC he said that strict military work had no meaning and that members of the force were “revolutionaries” and “enthusiastic” individuals who wanted to impact and defend the revolution and its accomplishments, adding that their mission was different from those in the regular armed forces. “Their participation in the Majlis elections was a form of defense of the fortifications of the revolution.”
Former IRGC commanders already hold some key positions in the Majlis among which are Mohammad Kowsari, Parviz Soroori, Mohammad Karamirad, Gholamreza Karami, seyed Ahmad Avai, and Aziz Akabarian. A significant number of the majority faction of the Majlis – i.e., the Principlists – is also made up individuals affiliated to the IRGC, the Basij official vigilantes and security agencies.
While the deadline that the ministry of the interior set for public figures to resign from their positions if they intended to register to run for the Majlis has already passed, the IRGC public relations office has till today not announced the names of any of its members who may have submitted their resignations for this purpose. Some media closely associated with Ahmadinejad’s administration have however published reports about the resignation of some IRGC members in order to run for the March elections.
The only IRGC official to have officially resigned from his post is cleric Mojtaba Zolnoor who is ayatollah Khamenei is deputy representative in the force. At the time of his resignation he announced that he would be retiring because he intended to run for the Majlis. Soon after that, general Ramezan Sharif, the PR official in the IRGC announced his acceptance of Zolnoor’s resignation.
The participation of IRGC officers in elections and their direct candidacy in the last presidential voting is viewed by many to be contrary to the express views of ayatollah Khomeini, the founder of the Islamic regime, who had said that “military institutions are barred from engaging in political affairs.” In his political will too he expressly said that members of the armed forces to which he also included the Basij, the police and others, should under no circumstances enter “political games.”
The constitution of the Islamic republic also stresses the same principle. The Penal Code for the Armed Forces of Iran also bars members of the armed forces from engaging in political activity. 
But despite such legal provisions and statements, IRGC members have run in various parliamentary and presidential elections. Last summer, IRGC general Yadollah Javani, the former head of the IRGC’s Political Office who had resigned from his post the month before, stressed on ayatollah Khamenei’s satisfaction of the performance of the force in recent years and particularly its involvement in the political affairs of the country and had said, “Some had thought that the Guard are merely a military institution and that it was like the army. Some political groups too had made the same interpretations for their own purpose and had tried to present the force as a purely military one and denounce its activities in other areas. But contrary to this view, the IRGC is a revolutionary institution, as defined and described by the constitution, the charter of the IRGC and the orders and guidance of ayatollah Khomeini, and the remarks of the supreme leader. Its principle mission is the defense of Islam, the Islamic revolution, and its accomplishments. This institution must be able to defend the revolution and its accomplishments ‘under any conditions’ and provide assistance to the direction of the revolution in accomplishing its goals and ideals.”
This former head of the IRGC’s political office had referenced ayatollah Khamenei’s remarks to stress that the work of the force was not limited to military affairs but included political, military, cultural and security domains as well. 
In September/October of this year, the commander of the IRGC Mohammad Ali Jaafari too said that the scope of IRGC remained unlimited. “Just as the supreme leader does not define any restrictions on the IRGC to perform its mission in its defense of the Islamic revolution, the force must be ready to defend the revolution and its achievements in all fields,” he said.
He referenced the force as “the arms of the leader” and said that the IRGC was no longer just the military arm of the leader but that it was also his non-military arm. “Defense of the revolution is a fluid phenomenon that is continuously growing which requires the force to be ready in all political, cultural and ideological spheres,” he said.]]>
		</summary>
	</entry>
	
</feed>

