Provide the Evidence
Judiciary’s Response to Ahmadinejad’s Remarks: - 2008.04.27

Mahbubeh Niknahad
Just a week after president Ahmadinejad in Qom publicly accused certain government agencies and organizations of complicity with the mafia groups operating in Iran, two government agencies both operating under the umbrella of the country’s judiciary reacted to his remarks.
Mohammad Niazi, the head of the country’s inspectorate general which is charged with following up on investigations of the bureaucracy, implicitly rejected the president’s accusations when he said, “The Inspectorate Organization intervenes in different issues and presents its findings and potential impact, but in this case the organization has not come across any specific economic mafia and no such report has been submitted to us.”
Hoseina Amiri, the assistant to the head of Iran’s judiciary, ayatollah Shahrudi who is also the head of the country’s official Register of Records organization too published an open letter to the president in which he said, “What has prompted this letter are the questions that have been raised by our dedicated and religious colleagues, which includes investigative journalists about your excellency’s comments in which you have detailed the shortcomings, problems and corrupt economic practices of the country. Your knowledge of what goes on in the government ministries agencies under your command is clear and expected but regardless of the extensive and noteworthy activities and measures of this organization which includes the large and important projects, … unfortunately the mention of the Register of Records organization as an organization that is affiliated to the judiciary along with other government agencies to be a source for discrimination, unfairness or as a mafia organization is surprising, unfortunate and the source of objection by the thousands of our colleagues here who have accepted the strenuous positions and tasks of this organization despite its minimum salaries and benefits because of the thousand vacancies (which had been communicated to you earlier).”
In another part of the letter, Amiri alluded to the legal consequences of the charges made by the president and writes, “Before your remarks become the subject of opportunism and the sources of rumors causing public concern and the creation of a negative atmosphere and irresponsible accusations against honest and hard-working employees and officials of this organization, it is requested that you instruct that any documents, evidence or proof that may exist for your remarks be investigated and sent to us for legal action.” At the conclusion of the letter, Amiri requests that the president give this issue his top priority and respond as soon as possible.
While parliamentary representatives and political activists belonging to the conservative camp have repeatedly responded to the recurrent accusations made by Mr. Ahmadinejad, through which they have denied his unpredictable claims, this is the first time that two senior administration officials, both belonging to the Supreme Judiciary Council, are directly standing up to the president and have requested an explanation from him.
It is noteworthy that in his letter to the president, Amiri writes, “You realize that using the term mafia in public, in addition to its meaning and the weight it carries in international law, carries negative consequences and damages to the bureaucratic and judiciary organization of the country, particularly as the audience to your remarks, as the chief executive of the country, believes that these rational and documented claims are certain and definitive.”
