In Search of New Methods of Resistance
Woman’s Movement in Interview with Nahid Keshavarz - 2008.03.12

Nahid Keshavarz, an activist for the One Million Signatures Campaign to Change Discriminatory Laws, has spoken to Rooz about the International Women’s Day on March 8th and the obstacles facing the women’s rights movement in Iran.
Rooz (R): What differences existed between this year and previous years’ International Women’s Day celebrations, in light of the difficult year that the women’s movement and the One Million Signatures Campaign has gone through?
Nahid Keshavarz (NK): The important characteristic [of this year’s celebrations] was that, because of police and security presence, celebrations were held mostly in private and closed spaces. Different events were held at universities across the country as well. We are now dealing with women’s groups that are connected to one another like a web, so even if they celebrate the women’s day in private, they still give it a public dimension, meaning they bring up issues that find resonance in the media and are printed in the press. Even if they find limited coverage in the print media, they find their place on the Internet.
R: What are the effects of celebrating the International Women’s Day in private? Could it weaken the voice that you work so hard to keep strong?
NK: The movement that has begun poses clear and immediate demands. Therefore, I do not think it can be stopped easily. Recently, when I was browsing the Internet, I saw that the Advar News website – the website connected to Daneshamukhtegan-e Tahkim-e Vahdat Organization student organization – has published a special report to commemorate March 8. Seeing this was both amazing and exciting for me. This means that no one can ignore this powerful movement. If you look at the list of people who were interviewed for their special reports, you will notice a stark difference in comparison with previous years, when these issues were not public. In previous years, these issues were on the sidelines, and politicians addressed them only in a demeaning tone. Now, the movement has imposes its rightful position on Iran’s civil and social atmosphere. As a result, no matter how hard they try to suppress it, this is not the kind of movement that can be suppressed. The movement may have to change its tactics or strategies, or try to search for new methods of resistance, but it will continue to persist and thrive.
R: In your opinion, how can the women’s rights movement establish relations with influential politicians to pursue its demands?
NK: I think if the women’s movement and the One Million Signatures Campaign can voice their demands in a very powerful manner in the public and social spheres, politicians will inevitably have to acknowledge their demands. The question that I always ask of myself is that, how is it that Ayatollah Sanei, who now talks about equality of rights for men and women, did not talk about these issues in the 1980s, when he headed the nation’s supreme court? Why is it that Ayatollah Rafsanjani, who was the country’s president for two terms, never talked about equal “dia” [blood money] for men and women, but has called for this in the past year and a half, after the women’s movement was able to stamp its mark on the face of Iran’s sociopolitical developments. Even people from conservative camp, such as Mrs. Maryam Behrouzi, speak about women’s legal demands. Mrs. Behrouzi may say that we do not need a Western women’s movement, but, at least, she has heard the voice of women’s movement and defends equal dia and insists that it is not right for men to marry multiple women.
R: What is the campaign’s most important program?
NK: The women’s movement has taken a very important step, which was to voice its demands in a clear voice on the public stage. If it can voice these demands louder and, while identifying shortcomings, use its available potential to propel itself forward, it will have a very bright future.
R: What are the shortcomings of the women’s movement?
NK: I think that our most important problem is that our demands appear politicized. Our main problem is the wrong understanding of Iranian officials who view women’s demands as political and security threats. In the past two years, we have not been able to hold meetings in even one public building. Day after day, the space for action shrinks.
