Women in Politics are not Stooges of Men
Farideh Mashini Tells Rooz: - 2008.01.13

Sara Samavati
Farideh Mashini is the chairwoman of the Women’s Committee in the Jebhe Mosharekat (Participation) front. She spoke with Rooz about the level of women’s participation in politics. “We have tried to show that women who enter politics are not stooges of men,” she said.
Rooz (R ): In your talks about women, you have reserved about 30 percent of the organizational posts for women. How has this move been received inside the party?
Farideh Mashini (FM): This is a problem. Even though this quota has been set, there are parts of the country where the idea has not been welcomed. In other parts of the country the quota is not met. Because of this, there was a request that we not make this quota mandatory and leave it to the actual circumstances. But we protested to this arguing that in that case nobody would work for it to fulfill the women’s posts. While it may be true that in some places women are not ready to take on political activities and posts, we have tried to show that those women who do, they are not the stooges of men and act independently. Furthermore, we have presented good women role models to show that they can be good politicians or political activists. In addition, we have shown that through women’s participation, women’s goals and demands can be met. In short, our goal has been to create the drive and motivation for women to participate in political issues, and at the same time remove the barriers that prevent this from happening.
R: Creating the right motivation may be the important step, because quotas can be created by mere legislation or internal bylaws. What specifically are the plans to create this?
FM: While we do not believe in separating men from women, and thus disagreed with creating a separate women’s group in the Jebhe Mosharekat, we agreed that in some parts of the country where there was a demand, to create women’s groups and develop the right staff and individuals for it. Another goal that we worked on was to make political parties accept that women’s issues were everybody’s issues, not just women’s. In other words we wanted political parties to partly to stop engaging only in those issues that had political weight and in fact take on the tangible social issues that permeate our nation. Examples of such issues are those relating to the family, gender quotas, and universities. It is through these issues that we can encourage women to participate and come on board.
R: Have the women in the Jebhe Mosharekat or in the reform movement in general tried to coordinate their work with the secular women’s groups?
FM: We have honestly extended our hand of friendship to all groups and have had discussions with many, of course based on our own beliefs and views. On subjects where there is common concern, we listen to the calls and views of the other groups and strive to cooperate together. On some issues such cooperation is difficult to attain, but still, what is important and key is that we recognize them and the issue, even if we disagree.
R: Do you think secular women too are making a similar effort? Do they too look at women’s rights issues through the same perspective that you do?
FM: Some of them do. Others who have made their own classifications and demarcations try less. But all of these are honorable and we respect them. We believe there are two important issues in this regard: The first is the primacy of women’s issues, and the second one is that since the majority of Iranians are Muslims, we refrain from getting into the differences when we discuss religion or gender identity issues. We think it is very important that women and groups in our society – ranging from housewives to educated ones – should not have the view that having a religious identity contradicts their gender identity and being. Through our religious interpretations, we believe that there is no such contradiction or disagreement.
