Multi-Layered Lists
Issa Saharkhiz - 2007.12.06

No more than a few weeks are left until the registration deadline for candidates running for a seat in the Eight Majlis, and no more than three months is left until the election day itself. The campaign season, however, has not gotten off the ground yet, and no considerable jitter or movement is heard from the reformist camp yet.
Whatever hustle and bustle one sees in society is not a deep-seated movement among the masses, but rather limited to activities of political parties or groupings.
Nevertheless, two important developments are taking place that have implications for future actions. The first is the emergence of a consensus that the country is in a serious condition, and hence the Eight Majlis must be a “national rescue” Majlis whose main goal is to diffuse the current crisis by moderating the controversial actions of rulers. Secondly, a more serious and concerted effort is under way to impose on the free will and independence of voters. The first step in this effort is to disqualify critical candidates and the second step is to prevent the names of people’s true elected representatives from coming out of ballot boxes through manipulating and rigging votes and utilizing legal and illegal methods under the supervision of the powerful duo of Jannati and Afshar.
The simplest and least costly response to such efforts is to register, in Tehran and provincial cities and towns, multiple layers of candidates who share similarities in their outlook and ideology.
The multi-layered registration of reformist and progressive candidates in the election of 24 Esfand, 1386 [March 14, 2008], is a correct policy that will, on the one hand, put the freeness of the elections to the public opinion test, while on the other, guarantee a higher degree of certainty for the qualification of reformist and progressive candidates. As a result, more candidates are able to pass the Guardian Council’s filter and enter the race.
However, it must be emphasized that the anti-authoritarian, democratic, freedom-seeking and humanitarian movement, if at all genuinely reformist, must not participate in any election until certain prerequisites are met, including the right to have plenty of candidates and to preserve the integrity of the ballot box. Reformist and progressive groups must not be content with participating in the elections only to acquire a few more seats and to control a few more levers of power.
